|
Post by Roy of the Rovers on Aug 18, 2017 10:05:53 GMT
Dont know if this helps SFA Handbook 2016/17 Where a club is found to have named within an Official Team Line a player who is not eligible to participate in the relevant match in the Competition pursuant to the Registration Procedures and/or the Disciplinary Procedures, then such club will be ejected from the Competition. Similarly where a club is found to have named within an Official Team Line a player who, in the same season, has already played (as one of the 11 first-named players or as a fielded substitute) for another club in the Competition, then such club will be ejected from the Competition. Neither the Board, nor the Judicial Panel nor the Secretary shall be entitled to waive or modify the application of this Rule in any circumstances; and c) in the event of disorderly conduct by a club in breach of Rule 28 or Article 28, such club may be ejected from the Competition.34.2 For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of this Rule 34 do not supersede or override the terms of any other Rule which addresses sanctions for infringement thereof. In the event that the Judicial Panel determines to impose a replay or suspension on or the ejection from the Competition on a club (save pursuant to Rule 34.1 (b)) which is found to have infringed these Rules, an appeal from the club against such determination must be dispatched in writing to the Scottish FA within 24 hours of the date of the club’s receipt of written notice of the Scottish FA’s determination. The terms of the Judicial Panel Protocol and Article 65 of the Articles of Association shall apply to such appeal mutatis mutandis. That's the rules for the Scottish Cup - the SPFL set rules for this cup.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2017 10:13:57 GMT
If we play Linfield ....I will not be going .....simply.... I will not pay money to watch sectarin people shouting and swearing and singing sectarian songs at a football match.
One of the main reasons I go to Rovers match is to aviod that stuff.
|
|
|
Post by Roy of the Rovers on Aug 18, 2017 10:14:18 GMT
The IRN_BRU rule:
8.6 Any Club, club or team in breach of or failing to fulfil these Regulations, including any club which is a member of a Recognised League and which participates in the Competition and thereby agrees to be bound by these Regulations and the Rules in so far as relating to and applying to this Competition, shall be liable to be dealt with and sanctioned in accordance with the terms of Section J of the Rules.
SPFL Section J:
Powers of the Board and Commissions J16 Upon determining that a breach of or failure to fulfil the Rules or Regulations has been established, the Board or, as the case may be, a Commission may:- J16.1 give a warning as to future conduct; J16.2 give a reprimand; J16.3 impose a fine; J16.4 annul the result of an Official Match; J16.5 order that an Official Match be replayed; J16.6 impose a deduction of points; J16.7 award an Official Match (with such deemed score as it thinks appropriate) to a Club; J16.8 order the playing of an Official Match or Matches behind closed doors; J16.9 order the closure of all or part of a Stadium for such period and for such purposes as it thinks appropriate; J16.10 order the playing of an Official Match or Matches at such Stadium as it thinks appropriate; J16.11 order the relegation of a Club to a lower Division and make such consequent orders as to promotion as it shall think appropriate; J16.12 subject to Rule J18, order that a Club be expelled from the League; J16.13 withdraw or withhold the award of a title or award; J16.14 order any Club, Official or Player to pay compensation to any Club, Player, person or party; J16.15 order any Club, Official or Player to comply with any obligation or direction; J16.16 cancel or refuse the Registration of any Player Registered or attempted to be Registered; J16.17 order that a Club concerned be debarred from Registering Players for such period as it thinks appropriate; J16.18 order that any person, persons or group of persons be prohibited from attending at such Official Match or Matches and for such period as it thinks appropriate; 80 J16.19 make such other direction, sanction or disposal, not expressly provided for in these Rules, as it shall think appropriate; and/or J16.20 make such order as to expenses, including the expenses of the Board and/or, as the case may be, Commission and/or other party, as it thinks appropriate. J17 When imposing a direction, sanction or disposal the Board or, as the case may be a Commission, may apply such number and combination of the directions, sanctions and/or disposals provide for in Rule J16 as it thinks appropriate, may make such provision for time to comply with any one or more of same as it thinks appropriate, may defer for such period or until such event as it shall think appropriate the decision on or imposition of a sanction or sanctions and shall be entitled to suspend the effect of any such direction, sanction or disposal for such period and/or on such conditions as it thinks appropriate.
So they can pretty much do what they like!
|
|
|
Post by kjg on Aug 18, 2017 17:44:33 GMT
Thanks for clearing that up. Now we know where we stand?
|
|
|
Post by Prof on Aug 18, 2017 20:59:11 GMT
Damn - assuming we are awarded the result against Spartans I would have loved to run a Millers 51-Seater toilet coach to Ireland!!
|
|
|
Post by Neil on Aug 18, 2017 21:05:48 GMT
Ian it's a home game.....
|
|
|
Post by Prof on Aug 18, 2017 21:09:03 GMT
Ian it's a home game..... Good point Neil - DOH!!!
|
|
|
Post by k70 on Aug 18, 2017 22:53:05 GMT
Prof. If the game gets the go ahead can I book a seat on your bus to Ireland please.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2017 12:16:10 GMT
Dont know if this helps SFA Handbook 2016/17 Where a club is found to have named within an Official Team Line a player who is not eligible to participate in the relevant match in the Competition pursuant to the Registration Procedures and/or the Disciplinary Procedures, then such club will be ejected from the Competition. Similarly where a club is found to have named within an Official Team Line a player who, in the same season, has already played (as one of the 11 first-named players or as a fielded substitute) for another club in the Competition, then such club will be ejected from the Competition. Neither the Board, nor the Judicial Panel nor the Secretary shall be entitled to waive or modify the application of this Rule in any circumstances; and c) in the event of disorderly conduct by a club in breach of Rule 28 or Article 28, such club may be ejected from the Competition.34.2 For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of this Rule 34 do not supersede or override the terms of any other Rule which addresses sanctions for infringement thereof. In the event that the Judicial Panel determines to impose a replay or suspension on or the ejection from the Competition on a club (save pursuant to Rule 34.1 (b)) which is found to have infringed these Rules, an appeal from the club against such determination must be dispatched in writing to the Scottish FA within 24 hours of the date of the club’s receipt of written notice of the Scottish FA’s determination. The terms of the Judicial Panel Protocol and Article 65 of the Articles of Association shall apply to such appeal mutatis mutandis. This pretty much seals our fate then. It doesn't mention a suspended player, so the Livingston precedence doesn't really stand. If it does go ahead, it could be moved to Airdrie and probably be sold out with Old Firm fans. I would rather see it at Cliftonhill though. However, as has been mentioned above, it is not a fixture which I would bring my son to. Just seen Roys post there.. so who knows..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2017 1:32:18 GMT
Any update on the situation?
|
|
|
Post by Roy of the Rovers on Aug 23, 2017 2:27:48 GMT
I believe that the decision shall be made tomorrow (Thursday) which doesn't give much time to fit in a replay.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2017 4:49:08 GMT
I believe that the decision shall be made tomorrow (Thursday) which doesn't give much time to fit in a replay. Thanks David, don't think anyone wants to sit through a replay if it is to be anything like the first game
|
|
|
Post by andrewrovers on Aug 23, 2017 7:44:53 GMT
It'll certainly be an interesting outcome, whatever happens, considering McGuigan did play, but didn't play a part in the shoot out
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2017 7:49:16 GMT
It'll certainly be an interesting outcome, whatever happens, considering McGuigan did play, but didn't play a part in the shoot out Perhaps as punishment we'll be forced to parachute into the North Lanarkshire Secondary Schools Cup.
|
|
|
Post by teekasule on Aug 23, 2017 11:39:44 GMT
So potentially the re match could be next Tuesday evening... 29th Aug. leaving 3 days to organise a ticket only match with a large police presence etc etc ? Should have been dealt with the next day - If the rules weren't so ambiguous for the Irn-Bru Cup.
|
|